ISEB-PM1 · Question #287
Company A is delivering a product in three parts. The contract allows for the parts to be delivered either one after the other or at the same time. Which type of project phasing will allow for the…
The correct answer is C. Delivering the products iteratively. Iterative delivery (C) is correct because it allows the team to build, get feedback, and adjust requirements between cycles - making it the most adaptive approach when requirements are unstable or changing rapidly. Sequencing phases one after the other (A) locks in decisions…
Question
Company A is delivering a product in three parts. The contract allows for the parts to be delivered either one after the other or at the same time. Which type of project phasing will allow for the most flexibility in delivering the full product when product requirements are subject to rapid change?
Options
- ASequencing the delivery phases one after the other
- BOverlapping the delivery phases
- CDelivering the products iteratively
- DDelivering all of the product at the same time
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A4% (1)
- B8% (2)
- C76% (19)
- D12% (3)
Explanation
Iterative delivery (C) is correct because it allows the team to build, get feedback, and adjust requirements between cycles - making it the most adaptive approach when requirements are unstable or changing rapidly. Sequencing phases one after the other (A) locks in decisions early and delays feedback, making it harder to respond to changes. Overlapping phases (B) can speed up delivery but introduces coordination risk and still doesn't inherently build in feedback loops for changing requirements. Delivering everything at once (D) offers zero flexibility - all requirements must be known and fixed upfront, the opposite of what's needed here.
Memory tip: Think of "iterative" as "iterate = revisit" - you keep revisiting and refining the product, which is exactly what rapid change demands. If requirements keep moving, you need a process that moves with them.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.