PMI-RMP · Question #219
Joan is a project management consultant and she has been hired by a firm to help them identify risk events within the project. Joan would first like to examine the project documents including the plan
The correct answer is B. Lack of consistency between the plans and the project requirements and assumptions can be the. During document review for risk identification, inconsistencies between project plans and requirements or assumptions are the primary signal that risks exist within the project.
Question
Joan is a project management consultant and she has been hired by a firm to help them identify risk events within the project. Joan would first like to examine the project documents including the plans, assumptions lists, project files, and contracts. What key thing will help Joan to discover risks within the review of the project documents?
Options
- AThe project documents will help the project manager, or Joan, to identify what risk identification
- BLack of consistency between the plans and the project requirements and assumptions can be the
- CPoorly written requirements will reveal inconsistencies in the project plans and documents.
- DPlans that have loose definitions of terms and disconnected approaches will reveal risks.
How the community answered
(38 responses)- A5% (2)
- B82% (31)
- C11% (4)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
During document review for risk identification, inconsistencies between project plans and requirements or assumptions are the primary signal that risks exist within the project.
This choice is incomplete and does not identify a specific technical reason; knowing what risk identification technique to use is a process consideration, not a finding from reviewing documents.
When project plans, requirements, and assumptions are inconsistent with one another, those gaps represent areas where the project's direction is unclear or contradictory, which are direct sources of risk events. PMBOK's documentation review technique specifically focuses on identifying misalignments between plans and stated requirements as indicators of latent risks. This inconsistency-focused lens is what distinguishes a structured risk-identification review from a general document audit.
Poorly written requirements may contribute to risk, but the root cause exposed by a document review is the inconsistency between plans and requirements, not the writing quality itself.
Loose definitions and disconnected approaches are symptoms of poor planning quality but are a subset of the broader inconsistency issue; they do not fully capture the primary risk-discovery mechanism of document review.
Concept tested: Documentation review technique for risk identification
Source: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/pmbok
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.