Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using public frameworks and standards?

Widely distributed knowledge is a genuine benefit because many practitioners are already trained in public frameworks, reducing the learning curve for new adopters.

Major public frameworks such as ITIL, COBIT, TOGAF, and ISO standards typically involve significant costs for official publications, training materials, examination fees, and licensing. The statement that they are 'always free' is factually incorrect, and therefore this cannot be listed as a benefit. The presence of 'always' makes this an absolute claim that is demonstrably false.

Validation across a wide range of environments is a true benefit, as public frameworks have been tested and refined by many organizations over time, increasing their robustness.

Providing a common language is a real benefit that makes inter-organizational collaboration easier, as teams from different companies share the same terminology and concepts.