Which two criteria are useful in deciding if something should be documented every sprint?

The correct answer is B. The documentation is used to enhance and maintain the software E. It is required by the definition of done. if the documentation is adding to the quality and maintenance of the software this is definitely a good argument for documenting every sprint. Just because that's the way it's done and we don't want change is not a good reason. Tooling that requires is also isn't. And the scrum m

Applying Scrum

Question

Options

AIt has always been documented in the past
BThe documentation is used to enhance and maintain the software
CThe scrum master demands it
DThe software tool being used requires it
EIt is required by the definition of done

How the community answered

(47 responses)

A
17% (8)
B
72% (34)
C
6% (3)
D
4% (2)

Explanation

if the documentation is adding to the quality and maintenance of the software this is definitely a good argument for documenting every sprint. Just because that's the way it's done and we don't want change is not a good reason. Tooling that requires is also isn't. And the scrum master cannot demand this kind of things. If the company's definition of done says so, you must :)

Topics

#sprint documentation#Definition of Done#documentation criteria

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PSD Practice