Your organization, as part of its enterprise environmental factors, has established risk governance to be implemented in each project. Part of this governance is the reassessment of risks within…

Question

Options

• AEach risk reassessment should go into the same depth as the original risk assessment activity.
• BThe probability and impact of risk event should determine the level of reassessment throughout the
• CThe amount of detail of repetition that is appropriate depends on how the project progresses relative to its
• DThe level of detail and reassessment should reflect the priority of the project.

• A
  10% (6)
• B
  3% (2)
• C
  84% (52)
• D
  3% (2)

Explanation

According to the PMBOK Guide, the appropriate level of detail and frequency of risk reassessment is determined by how the project is progressing relative to its defined objectives. If the project is on track, less intensive reassessment may be needed; if deviations occur, more thorough reassessment is warranted. Choice A (same depth as original) would be unnecessarily resource-intensive. Choice B (based solely on probability and impact) ignores project context. Choice D (based on project priority) is partially relevant but incomplete - project progress versus objectives is the authoritative PMBOK criterion for calibrating reassessment depth.

No community discussion yet for this question.