When conducting a risk identification exercise, what two actions should the risk manager take? (Choose two.)

Question

Options

• ARequest a contingency reserve from management
• BArrange a team meeting, review the project's scope, and discuss dependency mapping
• CEnsure participants review relevant documents before attending the meeting
• DEnsure that all the relevant stakeholders participate
• EUpdate the risk register during the team meeting.

• A
  9% (6)
• B
  70% (45)
• C
  17% (11)
• E
  3% (2)

Explanation

Effective risk identification requires both the right process and the right participants. Arranging a team meeting, reviewing the project's scope, and discussing dependency mapping (B) provides the structured context needed to systematically uncover risks-scope review reveals what could go wrong, and dependency mapping exposes interdependency risks. Ensuring all relevant stakeholders participate (D) is critical because different stakeholders have different perspectives and knowledge areas; missing key participants means missing risks. Requesting a contingency reserve (A) is a risk response activity, not an identification activity. Ensuring pre-meeting document review (C) is a good practice but is not one of the two primary actions. Updating the risk register during the meeting (E) is premature-identification should be completed before updating formal documents.

No community discussion yet for this question.