nerdexam
BCS-ISEB

ISEB-PM1 · Question #427

In the precedence diagramming method, which of the following is a logical relationship for the activities?

The correct answer is A. Finish-to-start. Finish-to-Start (FS) is one of the four logical relationships defined in the Precedence Diagramming Method - the others being Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Start, and Start-to-Finish. These relationships describe how the start or finish of one activity depends on the start or…

Project Planning

Question

In the precedence diagramming method, which of the following is a logical relationship for the activities?

Options

  • AFinish-to-start
  • BApplying leads and lags
  • CActivity-on-node
  • DDependency determination

How the community answered

(20 responses)
  • A
    80% (16)
  • B
    5% (1)
  • C
    10% (2)
  • D
    5% (1)

Explanation

Finish-to-Start (FS) is one of the four logical relationships defined in the Precedence Diagramming Method - the others being Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Start, and Start-to-Finish. These relationships describe how the start or finish of one activity depends on the start or finish of a predecessor.

Why the distractors are wrong:

  • B (Applying leads and lags) is a technique used to modify dependency relationships (e.g., overlapping or delaying activities), not a relationship type itself.
  • C (Activity-on-node) describes the structure of PDM - where nodes represent activities - not a logical relationship within it.
  • D (Dependency determination) is the process of identifying what dependencies exist between activities, a tool used during sequence planning, not a relationship type.

Memory tip: Think "FS, FF, SS, SF" - the four PDM relationship types all combine two states (Finish/Start) in pairs. Any answer that describes a technique or method rather than a state-pair is a distractor.

Topics

#precedence diagramming#finish-to-start#logical relationships#activity sequencing

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full ISEB-PM1 Practice