Refer to the exhibit. In this network, all routers are configured to run EIGRP on all interfaces. All interface bandwidths are set to 1000, and the delays are configured as shown. In the topology tabl

Feasible successor status at Router C does not cause Router D to suppress its advertisement - EIGRP routers advertise all known prefixes to neighbors regardless of the neighbor's role in the remote topology table.

A neighbor being a feasible successor in Router B's topology table has no bearing on whether Router B sends updates for that prefix, because feasible successor designation affects only local path selection and not update propagation.

EIGRP split horizon is a loop-prevention rule that prohibits a router from advertising a prefix back out the interface through which it originally received that prefix. If Router D learned about 10.1.1.0/24 via the link connecting it to Router C, split horizon stops Router D from re-advertising that prefix back to Router C, so Router C sees only the single path it already knows through another neighbor.

Split horizon on Router B would prevent Router B from re-advertising 10.1.1.0/24 back out the interface toward its source, but the topology's delay values indicate Router D - not Router B - is the router suppressing the advertisement due to split horizon.