Which two benefits of using BFD for failure detection are true? (Choose two)

BFD does not bypass a failed peer or reroute traffic itself; it detects the failure and notifies the routing protocol, which then performs its own convergence.

BFD has no auto-discovery mechanism; BFD sessions must be explicitly configured or triggered by a routing protocol registering a neighbor.

BFD is a protocol-independent detection mechanism that integrates with routing protocols including BGP, EIGRP, IS-IS, and OSPF, allowing any of them to use BFD sessions to detect path failures faster than their native timers.

BFD uses configurable timer intervals in the millisecond range, enabling failure detection well under one second - far faster than routing protocol hello/dead timer mechanisms which typically operate in seconds.

BFD does not suppress or replace routing protocol hello packets; it runs independently alongside the routing protocol's own keepalive mechanisms.

Single-hop BFD requires directly adjacent peers; while multi-hop BFD (RFC 5883) exists, stating that BFD peers generally do not need to be adjacent is incorrect and not a defined benefit.