352-001 · Question #170
When you design a network, when would it be required to leak routes into a Level 1 area?
The correct answer is B. when MPLS L3VPN PE devices are configured in the Level 1 areas. IS-IS Level 1 routers rely on a default route to reach destinations outside their area, but MPLS L3VPN PE devices require specific prefix reachability to build LSPs and forward VPN traffic. Route leaking from Level 2 into Level 1 is necessary to provide those specific routes.
Question
When you design a network, when would it be required to leak routes into a Level 1 area?
Options
- Awhen a multicast RP is configured in the nonbackbone area
- Bwhen MPLS L3VPN PE devices are configured in the Level 1 areas
- Cwhen equal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas
- Dwhen unequal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A15% (6)
- B49% (20)
- C32% (13)
- D5% (2)
Why each option
IS-IS Level 1 routers rely on a default route to reach destinations outside their area, but MPLS L3VPN PE devices require specific prefix reachability to build LSPs and forward VPN traffic. Route leaking from Level 2 into Level 1 is necessary to provide those specific routes.
Multicast RP reachability does not require route leaking because PIM can resolve the RP address using the default route that Level 1 routers already receive from the nearest L1/L2 boundary router.
MPLS L3VPN PE routers in a Level 1 area must have specific routes to remote PE devices to signal Label Switched Paths via LDP or RSVP-TE and to perform CEF-based VPN forwarding decisions. A default route toward the L1/L2 boundary router is insufficient for end-to-end LSP establishment, making Level 2 to Level 1 route leaking mandatory in this scenario.
Equal cost load balancing between backbone and nonbackbone areas is handled natively by the default route mechanism in Level 1 and does not require specific route leaking from Level 2.
Unequal cost load balancing is not a recognized technical justification for IS-IS route leaking; Level 1 routers forward traffic toward the closest L1/L2 router regardless of metric variation to the destination.
Concept tested: IS-IS Level 2 to Level 1 route leaking for MPLS VPN
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/47205-is-is-topo-route-leak.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.