nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #170

When you design a network, when would it be required to leak routes into a Level 1 area?

The correct answer is B. when MPLS L3VPN PE devices are configured in the Level 1 areas. IS-IS Level 1 routers rely on a default route to reach destinations outside their area, but MPLS L3VPN PE devices require specific prefix reachability to build LSPs and forward VPN traffic. Route leaking from Level 2 into Level 1 is necessary to provide those specific routes.

Layer 3 Control Plane

Question

When you design a network, when would it be required to leak routes into a Level 1 area?

Options

  • Awhen a multicast RP is configured in the nonbackbone area
  • Bwhen MPLS L3VPN PE devices are configured in the Level 1 areas
  • Cwhen equal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas
  • Dwhen unequal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas

How the community answered

(41 responses)
  • A
    15% (6)
  • B
    49% (20)
  • C
    32% (13)
  • D
    5% (2)

Why each option

IS-IS Level 1 routers rely on a default route to reach destinations outside their area, but MPLS L3VPN PE devices require specific prefix reachability to build LSPs and forward VPN traffic. Route leaking from Level 2 into Level 1 is necessary to provide those specific routes.

Awhen a multicast RP is configured in the nonbackbone area

Multicast RP reachability does not require route leaking because PIM can resolve the RP address using the default route that Level 1 routers already receive from the nearest L1/L2 boundary router.

Bwhen MPLS L3VPN PE devices are configured in the Level 1 areasCorrect

MPLS L3VPN PE routers in a Level 1 area must have specific routes to remote PE devices to signal Label Switched Paths via LDP or RSVP-TE and to perform CEF-based VPN forwarding decisions. A default route toward the L1/L2 boundary router is insufficient for end-to-end LSP establishment, making Level 2 to Level 1 route leaking mandatory in this scenario.

Cwhen equal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas

Equal cost load balancing between backbone and nonbackbone areas is handled natively by the default route mechanism in Level 1 and does not require specific route leaking from Level 2.

Dwhen unequal cost load balancing is required between the backbone and nonbackbone areas

Unequal cost load balancing is not a recognized technical justification for IS-IS route leaking; Level 1 routers forward traffic toward the closest L1/L2 router regardless of metric variation to the destination.

Concept tested: IS-IS Level 2 to Level 1 route leaking for MPLS VPN

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/47205-is-is-topo-route-leak.html

Topics

#IS-IS route leaking#Level 1 area#MPLS L3VPN#PE devices

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice