PRINCE2-PRACTITIONER · Question #272
A change authority has been appointed for the project. During the development of the 'classroom-based training material', a large number of changes were proposed to the design of the 'e-learning…
The correct answer is D. No, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the project's business justification. Explanation/Reference: When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2's continued business justification principle.
Question
A change authority has been appointed for the project. During the development of the 'classroom-based training material', a large number of changes were proposed to the design of the 'e-learning course'. Therefore, the change authority has decided to use the Moscow technique to prioritize changes based on the impact they will have on completing each stage on time. Is this an appropriate application of the Moscow technique, and why?
Options
- AYes, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the estimated impact on time.
- BYes, because it is a prioritization technique that should be used to prioritize a product's quality criteria.
- CNo, because it should define scope tolerances, supporting the management by exception principle.
- DNo, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the project's business justification.
How the community answered
(50 responses)- A8% (4)
- B14% (7)
- C4% (2)
- D74% (37)
Explanation
Explanation/Reference: When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2's continued business justification principle.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.