ITIL · Question #233
Which of the following statements correctly states the relationship between urgency, priority and impact?
The correct answer is D. Priority should be based on impact and urgency. In ITIL Incident Management, priority is determined by combining impact (the effect on the business) and urgency (how quickly resolution is needed), not the other way around.
Question
Which of the following statements correctly states the relationship between urgency, priority and impact?
Options
- AImpact, priority and urgency are independent of each other
- BUrgency should be based on impact and priority
- CImpact should be based on urgency and priority
- DPriority should be based on impact and urgency
How the community answered
(41 responses)- B2% (1)
- C5% (2)
- D93% (38)
Why each option
In ITIL Incident Management, priority is determined by combining impact (the effect on the business) and urgency (how quickly resolution is needed), not the other way around.
Impact, urgency, and priority are not independent - priority is directly dependent on both impact and urgency, so treating them as independent would undermine effective incident prioritization.
Urgency is an input into determining priority, not something based on impact and priority - reversing this relationship is incorrect.
Impact is assessed based on the scope of business effect and is an input to calculating priority; it is not derived from urgency and priority.
Priority is a derived value calculated from the assessment of both impact and urgency. Impact measures the degree of effect an incident or problem has on business processes, while urgency reflects the speed at which the business needs resolution. By combining these two factors - typically via a priority matrix - the appropriate priority level is assigned to drive resource allocation and SLA targets.
Concept tested: ITIL Incident Management - priority, impact, and urgency relationship
Source: https://www.axelos.com/resource-hub/blog/itil-incident-management
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.