A Monitoring Plan put into place at the conclusion of a project will provide for adequate systems with key metric readouts indicating out-of-spec conditions.

Question

Options

• ATrue
• BFalse

• A
  80% (35)
• B
  20% (9)

Explanation

Option A is correct because a Monitoring Plan established at the close of a project is specifically designed to ensure ongoing oversight through systems that track key metrics and flag out-of-spec conditions - this is its core purpose. A well-structured Monitoring Plan defines thresholds, identifies responsible parties, and establishes alert mechanisms so that deviations from acceptable ranges are caught and addressed proactively.

Option B (False) is incorrect because it contradicts the fundamental definition and intent of a Monitoring Plan; dismissing its adequacy ignores the established practice in project management, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance where such plans are considered essential for post-project control.

Memory tip: Think of a Monitoring Plan as a "dashboard with red lights" - it's the system that tells you when something goes outside the acceptable zone, just like a car's warning lights. If you remember that monitoring = watching for out-of-spec = the whole point, you'll always recognize this as True.

No community discussion yet for this question.