A customer has many branch offices with limited staff of IT generalists. The customer requires simplified deployment and operations, and you have proposed an Aruba Central solution. Which two…

Question

Options

• ACentral is designed for varied expertise levels, with wizards and easy drill-downs.
• BCentral integrates with third-party backup solutions such as Veeam to provide a single solution for
• CCentral offers Zero-Touch Provisioning (ZTP) for streamlined deployment with no on-site expertise.
• DCentral has the same user interface as Cisco Prime, so it is easy for customers to migrate from
• ECentral automatically configures clustering on managed controllers, simplifying the implementation

• A
  74% (20)
• B
  7% (2)
• D
  15% (4)
• E
  4% (1)

Explanation

A and C are correct because they directly address the customer's two stated pain points: limited IT expertise and simplified deployment. Aruba Central's wizard-driven interface (A) is built for generalists without deep networking knowledge, and Zero-Touch Provisioning (C) lets branch offices come online without requiring any on-site technical staff - devices self-configure upon first connection.

Why the distractors fail:

• B is fabricated - Central is a network management platform, not a data backup solution, and has no Veeam integration.
• D is false - Central has its own distinct UI; claiming it mimics Cisco Prime is a trap for customers migrating from Cisco, not a real feature.
• E is misleading - Central manages APs and switches via cloud, but controller clustering is a legacy on-prem concept; ZTP (option C) is the actual simplification story for deployment.

Memory tip: Think "Accessible + Cloud-first" - the two benefits that match "limited staff + simplified deployment" are the ones about interface ease (A) and zero-touch setup (C). Any answer referencing third-party tools, competitor UIs, or on-prem features is almost certainly a distractor in Aruba Central questions.

No community discussion yet for this question.