What is a result of the process cluster Functionality management?

Question

Options

• Aa changed information provisioning, ready for implementation
• Ba changed, tested and approved information provisioning that is being used

• A
  72% (34)
• B
  28% (13)

Explanation

Functionality Management (a BiSL process cluster) is responsible for analyzing, specifying, and designing changes to information provisioning - its output is a change that has been functionally defined and is ready to hand off for implementation, not yet implemented or in use. That makes A correct.

Why B is wrong: Option B describes a change that has been deployed and is actively in production use. This outcome belongs to a later stage - specifically after the Implementation (or Transition) process cluster takes the output from Functionality Management and actually carries out the change. Functionality Management stops at handing over a verified design; it does not govern go-live.

Memory tip: Think of Functionality Management as the blueprint phase - architects draw and approve the plans, but the building isn't built yet. When you see "ready for implementation," that's the blueprint being handed to the construction crew. If the question mentions something is already being used, the implementation cluster has already done its job, which is past Functionality Management's scope.

No community discussion yet for this question.