352-001 · Question #619
A network has several routers running IS-IS L1L2 mode on the same Ethernet segment. Which action reduces to a minimum the number of IS-IS adjacencies in this segment?
The correct answer is B. Change all routers connected to this segment to a single-level area. In IS-IS, routers operating in L1L2 mode on the same broadcast segment form both an L1 and an L2 adjacency with every other router, doubling the adjacency count. Converting all routers to a single level eliminates this duplication and minimizes adjacencies.
Question
A network has several routers running IS-IS L1L2 mode on the same Ethernet segment. Which action reduces to a minimum the number of IS-IS adjacencies in this segment?
Options
- ADefine only the router on the segment to be DIS
- BChange all routers connected to this segment to a single-level area
- CMake the interface priority on the backup DIS lower than the primary DIS
- DChange half the routers to be L1-only and other half to be L2-only on this segment
How the community answered
(47 responses)- A13% (6)
- B77% (36)
- C4% (2)
- D6% (3)
Why each option
In IS-IS, routers operating in L1L2 mode on the same broadcast segment form both an L1 and an L2 adjacency with every other router, doubling the adjacency count. Converting all routers to a single level eliminates this duplication and minimizes adjacencies.
Unlike OSPF where only DR/BDR relationships are fully established, IS-IS routers on a broadcast segment form adjacencies with all other routers regardless of which router is elected DIS, so changing DIS assignment has no effect on adjacency count.
When multiple L1L2 routers share an Ethernet segment, each router pair maintains two separate adjacencies - one for L1 and one for L2 - because IS-IS broadcast segments require full adjacency between all routers, not just with the DIS. Converting all routers to a single IS-IS level (all L1 or all L2) eliminates the dual adjacency requirement, reducing the total adjacency count by half and achieving the minimum possible for that segment.
Adjusting DIS interface priority only influences which router wins the DIS election; it has no bearing on the number of adjacencies established between routers on the segment.
Splitting routers into L1-only and L2-only prevents them from forming any adjacencies with each other since they operate in incompatible levels, which would create routing partitioning and loss of reachability rather than simply reducing adjacency count.
Concept tested: IS-IS L1/L2 adjacency reduction on broadcast segments
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_isis/configuration/xe-16/iri-xe-16-book/iri-overview.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.