352-001 · Question #494
Refer to the exhibit. You are a network designer for AS65100, which buys transit from AS65200 and AS65300. AS65200 and AS65300 have a peering relationship and they both implement RFC1998. You must…
The correct answer is A. Set the MED to be lower for less preferred prefixes. E. AS-path prepending for less preferred prefixes. MED and AS-path prepending are provider-independent, standards-based BGP mechanisms that influence inbound traffic to specific border routers and automatically adapt when a BGP session fails via route withdrawal.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. You are a network designer for AS65100, which buys transit from AS65200 and AS65300. AS65200 and AS65300 have a peering relationship and they both implement RFC1998. You must design a BGP policy that ensures that inbound traffic always arrives at AS65100's closest BGP router to the destination. For high availability and operational simplicity, there should be no manual intervention if a BGP relationship fails. Which two policies achieve this goal? (Choose 2)
Options
- ASet the MED to be lower for less preferred prefixes.
- BSet communities that influence the local preference of the transit provider.
- CBGP remote trigger black hole for less preferred prefixes.
- DSelective route advertisement.
- EAS-path prepending for less preferred prefixes.
How the community answered
(63 responses)- A65% (41)
- B5% (3)
- C22% (14)
- D8% (5)
Why each option
MED and AS-path prepending are provider-independent, standards-based BGP mechanisms that influence inbound traffic to specific border routers and automatically adapt when a BGP session fails via route withdrawal.
MED (Multi-Exit Discriminator) allows AS65100 to advertise the same prefix through multiple border routers with different MED values - a lower MED signals to the transit provider that the corresponding entry point is preferred, steering inbound traffic to the closest border router without any manual reconfiguration if a session fails.
Although RFC1998 communities influence a transit provider's local preference, this method depends on provider-specific community support and does not directly guarantee hot-potato routing to the closest AS65100 border router in a deterministic way across both transit providers.
BGP remote trigger black hole is a technique for null-routing unwanted traffic by signaling a discard route, not a mechanism for steering inbound traffic to a specific preferred border router.
Selective route advertisement can change which prefixes are reachable via a given path but does not reliably enforce closest-router entry for all prefixes and may require manual updates when topology changes occur.
AS-path prepending on routes advertised through less preferred border routers artificially lengthens the AS path, causing transit providers to select the shorter-path route through the preferred (closest) entry point; since route withdrawal is automatic upon BGP session failure, this mechanism requires no manual intervention to maintain correct traffic flow.
Concept tested: BGP inbound traffic engineering using MED and AS-path prepending
Source: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4451
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.