352-001 · Question #435
Which option is a critical mechanism to optimize convergence speed when using MPLS FRR?
The correct answer is A. down detection. MPLS Fast Reroute pre-computes backup paths, but the time to switch to those paths is gated entirely by how quickly a failure is detected - making down detection the critical mechanism for optimizing convergence speed.
Question
Which option is a critical mechanism to optimize convergence speed when using MPLS FRR?
Options
- Adown detection
- Bshared risk link groups
- Cbandwidth reservation
- DIGP timers
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A70% (19)
- B15% (4)
- C4% (1)
- D11% (3)
Why each option
MPLS Fast Reroute pre-computes backup paths, but the time to switch to those paths is gated entirely by how quickly a failure is detected - making down detection the critical mechanism for optimizing convergence speed.
Down detection, typically accelerated using BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), determines how fast the head-end or PLR (Point of Local Repair) learns of a failure and activates the pre-computed FRR backup path. Without fast failure detection, the pre-computed backup provides no convergence benefit because the failover trigger is delayed.
Shared Risk Link Groups (SRLGs) improve backup path diversity and reliability but do not directly accelerate the speed at which convergence occurs after a failure.
Bandwidth reservation ensures capacity on backup paths but has no bearing on how quickly a failure is detected or the FRR switchover is triggered.
IGP timer tuning affects overall topology reconvergence, but MPLS FRR is specifically designed to operate independently of IGP convergence - the bottleneck is detection speed, not IGP.
Concept tested: MPLS FRR failure detection and convergence optimization
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_te_path_protect/configuration/xe-16/mp-te-path-protect-xe-16-book/mp-frr-bfd.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.