352-001 · Question #173
352-001 Question #173: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
The correct answer is C: Add a layer of regional Layer 3 aggregation devices and move the ABR function to the regional. Adding a regional Layer 3 aggregation tier and moving the OSPF ABR function to that tier creates area boundaries that contain access-layer link flap LSAs within regional areas, preventing them from flooding the data center backbone. This hierarchical restructuring limits SPF reca
Question
Options
- AAdd a layer of regional Layer 3 aggregation devices, but leave the ABR function on the data center
- BAdd a layer of regional Layer 2 aggregation devices, but leave the ABR function on the data center
- CAdd a layer of regional Layer 3 aggregation devices and move the ABR function to the regional
- DAdd a layer of regional Layer 2 aggregation devices and move the ABR function to the regional
Explanation
Adding a regional Layer 3 aggregation tier and moving the OSPF ABR function to that tier creates area boundaries that contain access-layer link flap LSAs within regional areas, preventing them from flooding the data center backbone. This hierarchical restructuring limits SPF recalculations to the affected region.
Common mistakes.
- A. Adding regional Layer 3 devices but keeping the ABR at the data center leaves data center routers still processing all access-layer Type-1 and Type-2 LSAs, so link flap instability is not contained at the regional boundary.
- B. Regional Layer 2 devices do not participate in OSPF routing and cannot form area boundaries, meaning access-layer topology changes still propagate as Layer 3 LSAs directly to the data center aggregation routers.
- D. Layer 2 devices cannot host the OSPF ABR function because ABR is a Layer 3 OSPF construct requiring full routing plane participation; placing the ABR role on a Layer 2 device is not technically feasible.
Concept tested. OSPF hierarchical redesign with regional ABR for stability
Reference. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/7039-1.html
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.