nerdexam
Cisco

300-510 · Question #40

What is one of the configuration errors within an AS that can stop a Cisco IOS-XR router from announcing certain prefixes to its EBGP peers?

The correct answer is A. Some prefixes were mistagged with the no-export BGP community. The BGP 'no-export' well-known community (value 0xFFFFFF01) explicitly instructs a BGP router not to advertise tagged prefixes to any EBGP peers. If an operator accidentally applies the no-export community to prefixes via a route policy or static configuration, those prefixes…

Routing Policy and Manipulation

Question

What is one of the configuration errors within an AS that can stop a Cisco IOS-XR router from announcing certain prefixes to its EBGP peers?

Options

  • ASome prefixes were mistagged with the no-export BGP community
  • BSome prefixes were set with an MED of 0
  • CThe outbound BGP route policy only has set actions defined without any pass actions defined
  • DThe inbound BGP route policy only has set actions defined without any pass actions defined

How the community answered

(25 responses)
  • A
    88% (22)
  • B
    8% (2)
  • D
    4% (1)

Explanation

The BGP 'no-export' well-known community (value 0xFFFFFF01) explicitly instructs a BGP router not to advertise tagged prefixes to any EBGP peers. If an operator accidentally applies the no-export community to prefixes via a route policy or static configuration, those prefixes will be withheld from all external BGP peers even though they exist in the local BGP table. This is a silent error - the router holds the prefix internally but never sends it to EBGP neighbors. Option B (MED of 0) is the default and does not block advertisement. Option C describes an IOS-XR policy issue but pertains to all routes being dropped, not selective prefix suppression. Option D (inbound policy issues) affects what the router accepts, not what it announces.

Topics

#BGP communities#BGP route policy#EBGP

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-510 Practice