SAFE-SP · Question #25
Which statement describes the information within a Story?
The correct answer is A. A Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and. A Story is intentionally lightweight - it contains just enough information for both business stakeholders and developers to understand the intent, with the expectation that conversations will flesh out the details during implementation. Option B is wrong because Stories are not…
Question
Which statement describes the information within a Story?
Options
- AA Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and
- BA Story is written in full detailed specifications so that the work is ready to be implemented
- CNo further conversation is required after the Story is identified because it contains all necessary
- DStory acceptance criteria must be finalized before beginning Iteration Planning
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A92% (23)
- B4% (1)
- C4% (1)
Explanation
A Story is intentionally lightweight - it contains just enough information for both business stakeholders and developers to understand the intent, with the expectation that conversations will flesh out the details during implementation. Option B is wrong because Stories are not full detailed specifications; that level of detail belongs in technical design documents and defeats the purpose of iterative collaboration. Option C is wrong because Stories are meant to start conversations, not end them - the phrase "card, conversation, confirmation" (the 3 Cs of user stories) captures this: the card is just a placeholder for a conversation. Option D is wrong because acceptance criteria can be refined during Iteration Planning itself; requiring them to be finalized before planning is too rigid and contradicts Agile's embrace of evolving detail.
Memory tip: Think of a Story as a "conversation starter," not a "contract." The goal is shared understanding, not exhaustive documentation.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.