PMI-RMP · Question #392
Very low = 1, Low = 2, Moderate = 3, High = 4, Very High = 5. A project manager must complete a report for a stakeholder who is concerned about the possibility of a funding shortfall. What is the…
The correct answer is B. The funding shortage is a significant risk. Option B-'The funding shortage is a significant risk'-is the most effective because it accurately communicates the importance of the risk without making claims that are unsupported by data provided in the question. Options A, C, and D each assert specific probability or impact…
Question
Very low = 1, Low = 2, Moderate = 3, High = 4, Very High = 5. A project manager must complete a report for a stakeholder who is concerned about the possibility of a funding shortfall. What is the most effective way to explain the risk to this stakeholder?
Exhibit
Options
- AThe funding shortage is the lowest ranked/scored risk.
- BThe funding shortage is a significant risk.
- CThe funding shortage will have a very high impact on the project and is the highest priority.
- DThe funding shortage has a very low probability of occurring and is not a concern for the project.
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A15% (4)
- B69% (18)
- C4% (1)
- D12% (3)
Explanation
Option B-'The funding shortage is a significant risk'-is the most effective because it accurately communicates the importance of the risk without making claims that are unsupported by data provided in the question. Options A, C, and D each assert specific probability or impact scores (lowest ranked, very high impact/highest priority, or very low probability) without any score data being given in the scenario. When communicating risk to a stakeholder, clarity and accuracy matter most; overstating (C) could cause panic, understating (A or D) could cause complacency. A measured, defensible statement like 'significant risk' is the professionally appropriate choice.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
