nerdexam
PMI

PMI-ACP · Question #765

An agile practitioner notices that team members are disengaged. As a result, the team's velocity has decreased. What should the agile practitioner do to get the team back on track?

The correct answer is D. Facilitate a team retrospective. A team retrospective is the proper agile mechanism for addressing disengagement and performance issues. It creates a safe, structured space for the team to openly discuss what's wrong, identify root causes of disengagement, and collaboratively agree on improvements. Option A…

Submitted by weili_xi· Apr 18, 2026Continuous Improvement

Question

An agile practitioner notices that team members are disengaged. As a result, the team's velocity has decreased. What should the agile practitioner do to get the team back on track?

Options

  • AEscalate the issue to the project sponsor.
  • BRemove stories to increase velocity.
  • CHold a standup to address the issue.
  • DFacilitate a team retrospective.

How the community answered

(22 responses)
  • A
    9% (2)
  • B
    14% (3)
  • C
    5% (1)
  • D
    73% (16)

Explanation

A team retrospective is the proper agile mechanism for addressing disengagement and performance issues. It creates a safe, structured space for the team to openly discuss what's wrong, identify root causes of disengagement, and collaboratively agree on improvements. Option A (escalating to the sponsor) is premature and bypasses the team's self-organizing capability. Option B (removing stories) treats the symptom (low velocity) rather than the root cause (disengagement). Option C (a standup) is too brief and informal for addressing a cultural or motivational issue - standups are for daily coordination, not problem-solving team dynamics.

Topics

#Team Disengagement#Retrospective#Continuous Improvement#Team Performance

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PMI-ACP Practice