PK0-004 · Question #193
Team members have reported poor sound quality during critical, time-sensitive conference calls. Which of the following may be a more effective means of communication?
The correct answer is A. One-on-one meetings. When audio quality is poor during time-sensitive calls, one-on-one meetings provide direct, unambiguous communication without the technical limitations of conference infrastructure.
Question
Team members have reported poor sound quality during critical, time-sensitive conference calls. Which of the following may be a more effective means of communication?
Options
- AOne-on-one meetings
- BProject wiki
- CText messages
- DSocial media
How the community answered
(54 responses)- A91% (49)
- B2% (1)
- C2% (1)
- D6% (3)
Why each option
When audio quality is poor during time-sensitive calls, one-on-one meetings provide direct, unambiguous communication without the technical limitations of conference infrastructure.
One-on-one meetings eliminate the audio degradation and cross-talk issues inherent in multi-party conference calls by reducing the communication to two participants in a direct channel. For critical, time-sensitive discussions, this format ensures clarity, allows immediate clarification, and removes the technical bottleneck causing the poor sound quality.
A project wiki is an asynchronous, document-based tool and cannot replace real-time verbal communication needed for time-sensitive conference discussions.
Text messages are limited in bandwidth for complex, time-sensitive discussions and lack the verbal nuance required for critical project communications.
Social media is an informal, public-facing channel unsuitable for confidential, critical business communications.
Concept tested: Selecting appropriate communication methods for project needs
Source: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/pmbok
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.