PFMP · Question #495
In a portfolio, data is an abundant asset, and managing the information aiming for a better decision making is critical. For this you use a variety of Quantitative and Qualitative analysis methods…
The correct answer is D. Scoring models. Scoring models bridge quantitative and qualitative evaluation by assigning weighted criteria scores to components, enabling structured comparison of intangible benefits that cannot be measured numerically.
Question
In a portfolio, data is an abundant asset, and managing the information aiming for a better decision making is critical. For this you use a variety of Quantitative and Qualitative analysis methods. Considering that you are currently working to quantitatively measure component values, however a few components have intangible benefits and can not be measured using quantitative analysis. How do you plan to proceed?
Options
- ASubject Matter Experts
- BBenefits Realization
- CUsing assumptions
- DScoring models
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A4% (1)
- B8% (2)
- C12% (3)
- D77% (20)
Why each option
Scoring models bridge quantitative and qualitative evaluation by assigning weighted criteria scores to components, enabling structured comparison of intangible benefits that cannot be measured numerically.
Subject matter experts provide qualitative opinions, but do not produce a systematic, repeatable measurement framework that allows consistent comparison of intangible benefits across portfolio components.
Benefits realization is a process for tracking and confirming that planned benefits are achieved after implementation, not a tool for measuring or scoring potential component value during selection.
Using assumptions introduces unvalidated and potentially biased estimates into the evaluation and is not recognized as a measurement technique for intangible benefits.
Scoring models allow portfolio managers to define multiple evaluation criteria, assign weights reflecting strategic importance, and score components against each criterion - including intangible benefits like brand value or stakeholder satisfaction. This produces a semi-quantitative composite score that enables objective comparison across components regardless of whether all benefits are directly measurable.
Concept tested: Scoring models for evaluating intangible component benefits
Source: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/standard-for-portfolio-management
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.