As part of the governance function, the governance board members are required to be present in the portfolio review meeting in order to know the status of the portfolio and be able to take decisions on pending points. When it comes to review meetings, which of the following is valid?

Question

Accepted Answer

A. Formal and recurring governance board meetings Portfolio governance review meetings are defined as formal, scheduled, and recurring gatherings of the governance board. Their recurring nature ensures consistent oversight, timely status visibility, and the ability to make ongoing decisions about portfolio components in a structured, accountable setting aligned with the governance framework.

Answer

B. Formal and held when needed to take decisions regarding the portfolio Governance meetings are recurring by design - waiting until decisions are needed creates gaps in oversight and reactive rather than proactive governance.

Answer

C. Non-recurring and informal meetings that allow the governance board to check on the portfolio's Portfolio governance meetings are formal and structured, not non-recurring or informal - informality undermines accountability and the integrity of governance decisions.

Answer

D. Meeting between the functional managers and the governance board in order to discuss financial Governance board meetings are not limited to financial discussions with functional managers - they cover all aspects of portfolio status and strategic decision-making.

As part of the governance function, the governance board members are required to be present in the portfolio review meeting in order to know the status of the portfolio and be able to take decisions…

Question

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion