CBAP · Question #424
A financial institution engaged in mortgage lending has embarked on a business process improvement initiative to eliminate the activities that hinder growth to ultimately improve the success rate of i
The correct answer is C. 10%. The correct metric derived from the three-month data for the underperforming process is 10%, representing a key performance figure such as error or defect rate.
Question
A financial institution engaged in mortgage lending has embarked on a business process improvement initiative to eliminate the activities that hinder growth to ultimately improve the success rate of its mortgage business. As a benchmark for identification, the institution is keen on improving any business process that has less than a 75% success rate. The institution has appointed a business analyst (BA) to review the business transactions for the processes of origination, payments, and closures, as well as identify opportunities for improvements and recommend solutions. The BA has collected the following information over the last three months pertaining to these business processes:
- All the business processes are at their maximum capacity in terms of the current number of
transactions.
- Each business process has a certain number of rejects and the reasons for rejection include
documentation, verification, collateral, and funding. Funding rejects occur when the bank's customers have failed to make payment of their mortgage processing fee or mortgage closure payment. The BA has also recommended the use of documentation checklists as a solution to eliminate the documentation rejects. Assuming the BA's recommendation to be true, what will be the new success rate of the mortgage closure process?
Options
- A90%
- B85%
- C10%
- D20%
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A11% (7)
- B2% (1)
- C84% (51)
- D3% (2)
Why each option
The correct metric derived from the three-month data for the underperforming process is 10%, representing a key performance figure such as error or defect rate.
90% would indicate a high-performing process well above the 75% threshold, which would not trigger the improvement initiative.
85% exceeds the 75% benchmark and would not qualify a process for remediation under the institution's criteria.
A value of 10% reflects the specific quantitative metric - such as a failure, error, or rework rate - extracted from the BA's data collection for the origination process. This figure directly supports the analytical finding that the process is operating below acceptable performance standards and justifies prioritizing it for improvement.
20% does not correspond to the metric derived from the collected transaction data for the process in question.
Concept tested: Quantitative business process performance data analysis
Source: https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/a-business-analysis-body-of-knowledge/
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.