How does DSDM differ from most agile approaches?

Question

Options

• ADSDM agile involves the business in the solution to be developed at an early stage, so that
• BThe approach mainly focuses on the technical feasibility of a project, so there are fewer surprises.
• CDSDM agile is a stripped-down version of other approaches, resulting in fewer roles
• DLess is done for research than in other approaches, so projects start faster and are completed

• A
  92% (23)
• C
  4% (1)
• D
  4% (1)

Explanation

Option A is correct because DSDM (Dynamic Systems Development Method) is uniquely characterized by mandating active business involvement as a core principle from the very start. Unlike many agile frameworks that treat stakeholder engagement as a recommended practice, DSDM formally defines dedicated business roles - such as Business Sponsor, Business Visionary, and Business Ambassador - who are embedded in the project from the earliest phases, ensuring the solution remains aligned with business needs throughout.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• B is incorrect because DSDM balances both business and technical perspectives; it explicitly avoids a purely technical focus through its business-facing roles.
• C is the opposite of reality - DSDM actually defines more roles than many agile approaches, particularly on the business side.
• D is also opposite to reality; DSDM includes dedicated upfront phases (Feasibility and Foundations) where research and analysis are performed before development begins.

Memory tip: Think of the "B" in DSDM as standing for "Business First" - its biggest differentiator is formalizing business representation as a structural requirement, not an afterthought. If an exam question mentions mandatory business roles in agile, think DSDM.

No community discussion yet for this question.