nerdexam
Cisco

500-440 · Question #98

Which three options are valid when Cisco Unified Customer Voice Portal comprehensive call flow and survivability service handles SIP REFER? (Choose three.)

The correct answer is B. An application-controlled alternative is to set an ECC variable (user.sip.refertransfer) to the value C. Router require on a failed SIP Refer transfer where the survivability service is not handling the E. Unified ICM sends Unified CVP a routing label with a format of rfXXXX. In Cisco Unified CVP's SIP REFER handling, option B is correct because user.sip.refertransfer is a legitimate ECC variable that gives script designers application-level control over REFER transfer behavior - it's a documented alternative to label-based transfer. Option C is…

Design Considerations for Cisco Unified CVP

Question

Which three options are valid when Cisco Unified Customer Voice Portal comprehensive call flow and survivability service handles SIP REFER? (Choose three.)

Options

  • ASIP trunk alternate destination routing (ADR) must be disabled for REFER
  • BAn application-controlled alternative is to set an ECC variable (user.sip.refertransfer) to the value
  • CRouter require on a failed SIP Refer transfer where the survivability service is not handling the
  • DDirect Refer transfer using label works only if Send To VRU node is NOT used before the Refer
  • EUnified ICM sends Unified CVP a routing label with a format of rfXXXX
  • FStandalone Cisco Unified CVP with ICM Lookup label

How the community answered

(56 responses)
  • A
    13% (7)
  • B
    80% (45)
  • D
    5% (3)
  • F
    2% (1)

Explanation

In Cisco Unified CVP's SIP REFER handling, option B is correct because user.sip.refertransfer is a legitimate ECC variable that gives script designers application-level control over REFER transfer behavior - it's a documented alternative to label-based transfer. Option C is correct because when a SIP REFER transfer fails and the CVP survivability service is not in scope, Unified ICM's router re-queues (requires) the call to find an alternate routing path. Option E is correct because Unified ICM signals CVP to execute a REFER transfer by sending a routing label in the specific rfXXXX format (e.g., rf5001), which CVP interprets as a REFER instruction rather than a standard transfer label.

Why the distractors are wrong:

  • A is incorrect - ADR does not need to be disabled; it can coexist with REFER handling.
  • D is incorrect - Direct REFER using a label is not blocked by prior use of the Send To VRU node; that restriction does not apply here.
  • F is incorrect - Standalone CVP with ICM Lookup is a deployment topology, not a valid SIP REFER handling option.

Memory tip: Think BCE = "REFER's three pillars" - Behavior via ECC variable, Call re-route on failure, Exact label format (rf). The rf prefix in option E is the clearest giveaway - whenever you see a routing label that starts with rf, CVP knows to issue a SIP REFER.

Topics

#SIP REFER handling#CVP call flow#ECC variables#Survivability service

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 500-440 Practice