352-001 · Question #566
Refer to the exhibit. This enterprise customer wants to stream one-way video from their head office to eight branch offices using multicast. Their current service provider provides a Layer 3VPN soluti
The correct answer is C. Enable a GRE tunnel between nodes C2 and C4. When a service provider does not support multicast and manages the CE routers, the customer can establish a GRE tunnel between their own CPE routers to encapsulate multicast traffic across the L3VPN.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. This enterprise customer wants to stream one-way video from their head office to eight branch offices using multicast. Their current service provider provides a Layer 3VPN solution and manages the CE routers, but they do not currently multicast. Which solution quickly allows this multicast traffic to go through while allowing for future scalability?
Exhibit
Options
- AEnable a GRE tunnel between nodes C1 and C4
- BEnable a GRE tunnel between nodes CE1 and CE2
- CEnable a GRE tunnel between nodes C2 and C4
- DImplement hub and spoke MPLS VPN over DMVPN(also known as 2547oDMVPN) between CE1
- EThe service provider must provide a Draft Rosen Solution to enable a GRE tunnel node PE1 and
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A7% (2)
- B4% (1)
- C59% (16)
- D19% (5)
- E11% (3)
Why each option
When a service provider does not support multicast and manages the CE routers, the customer can establish a GRE tunnel between their own CPE routers to encapsulate multicast traffic across the L3VPN.
C1 and C4 may not represent the correct customer CPE endpoints for this topology, and a tunnel between those nodes would not address the head-office-to-branch multicast path.
CE1 and CE2 are managed by the service provider, so the customer cannot configure tunnels on those devices without SP involvement.
C2 and C4 are customer-controlled routers sitting behind the SP-managed CE devices. By building a GRE tunnel between these two nodes, the customer encapsulates multicast packets inside unicast GRE, allowing them to traverse the SP's L3VPN without requiring any SP multicast support. This approach is quick to deploy and scales to additional spokes by adding more GRE tunnels or migrating to DMVPN later.
2547oDMVPN is a valid scalable solution but requires significant MPLS and DMVPN configuration changes on the SP side, making it not a quick deployment.
The Draft Rosen (mVPN) solution requires the service provider to configure multicast on their PE routers, which contradicts the premise that the SP does not currently support multicast.
Concept tested: GRE tunneling to carry multicast over non-multicast L3VPN
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipmulti_pim/configuration/xe-16/imc-pim-xe-16-book/imc-gre-tun.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
