352-001 · Question #564
A DMVPN network is being deployed for 10 branch sites to connect to the central headquarters over the Internet. Each branch site connects to the internet via a 1.5 Mb/s ADSL line, and the headquarters
The correct answer is B. Applying hierarchical QoS with parent policy for the overall circuit and child policy for the spokes. In this DMVPN design, hierarchical QoS (HQoS) at HQ is required to enforce the 20 Mb/s aggregate limit as a parent policy while applying per-spoke child policies that match each branch's 1.5 Mb/s ADSL constraint.
Question
A DMVPN network is being deployed for 10 branch sites to connect to the central headquarters over the Internet. Each branch site connects to the internet via a 1.5 Mb/s ADSL line, and the headquarters connects to the Internet over a 100Mb/s circuit limited to 20 Mb/s by the service provider. Which QoS mechanism if any, do you recommend at the headquarters location?
Options
- ARate-limiting the 100 Mb/s circuit to 20 Mb/s
- BApplying hierarchical QoS with parent policy for the overall circuit and child policy for the spokes
- CTraffic shaping the 100 Mb/s circuit to 20 Mb/s
- DQoS is not required in this instance due to maximum traffic being received by the branches being
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A30% (13)
- B43% (19)
- C18% (8)
- D9% (4)
Why each option
In this DMVPN design, hierarchical QoS (HQoS) at HQ is required to enforce the 20 Mb/s aggregate limit as a parent policy while applying per-spoke child policies that match each branch's 1.5 Mb/s ADSL constraint.
Rate-limiting (policing) discards excess packets rather than buffering and scheduling them, causing unnecessary drops and providing no ability to prioritize critical traffic within the constrained bandwidth.
HQoS uses a parent shaper policy to rate the HQ output to 20 Mb/s (matching the SP-imposed limit) and child policies attached per-spoke tunnel to ensure HQ never bursts traffic toward any branch beyond the 1.5 Mb/s the branch ADSL can accept, while also enabling DSCP-based prioritization within each spoke's allocation.
A flat shaping policy applied only to the 20 Mb/s aggregate does not address per-spoke fairness or the 1.5 Mb/s branch constraint, leaving individual spokes vulnerable to starvation or over-subscription.
QoS is required because the aggregate HQ uplink (20 Mb/s) can easily overwhelm individual branch ADSL lines (1.5 Mb/s each), and without per-spoke shaping critical traffic will be dropped at the branch access loop.
Concept tested: Hierarchical QoS for DMVPN hub spoke bandwidth management
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/DMVPN_2_Phase2/DMVPN_QoS.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.