352-001 · Question #704
Which statement about traffic shaping is true?
The correct answer is D. It enforces an upper limit on bursty data traffic. Traffic shaping enforces an upper rate limit on bursty traffic by buffering excess packets and releasing them at a controlled, sustained rate.
Question
Which statement about traffic shaping is true?
Options
- AIt works by minimizing data transmission intervals
- BIt separates data packets based on certain characteristics by using NBAR
- CIt regulates data transmission patterns into the network
- DIt enforces an upper limit on bursty data traffic
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A4% (1)
- C4% (1)
- D93% (25)
Why each option
Traffic shaping enforces an upper rate limit on bursty traffic by buffering excess packets and releasing them at a controlled, sustained rate.
Shaping works by buffering and delaying excess traffic to smooth the rate of transmission; it does not minimize data transmission intervals.
NBAR is a deep-packet-inspection classification tool used to identify application traffic; it is not a component of the traffic shaping process.
While shaping does influence transmission patterns, this description is too vague and applies equally to policing and other QoS mechanisms - the defining and testable characteristic of shaping is its specific buffering approach to enforce a rate ceiling on bursts.
Shaping uses a token bucket mechanism to enforce a maximum average transmission rate, queuing packets that exceed the configured rate and releasing them in a controlled stream - effectively capping bursty traffic at the defined ceiling. This buffering behavior is what distinguishes shaping from policing, which discards excess traffic rather than holding and smoothing it.
Concept tested: Traffic shaping rate enforcement and burst control mechanism
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/quality-of-service-qos/qos-policing/19645-policevsshape.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.