nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #16

A new video multicast application is deployed in the network. The application team wants to use the 239.0.0.1 multicast group to stream the video to users. They want to know if this choice will impact

The correct answer is D. The 239.0.0.1 group address maps to a system MAC address, and all multicast traffic will have to. The multicast address 239.0.0.1 maps to the same Layer 2 MAC address as the well-known 224.0.0.1 All Hosts group, causing all hosts to receive and process the multicast traffic regardless of subscription.

Designing Network Services

Question

A new video multicast application is deployed in the network. The application team wants to use the 239.0.0.1 multicast group to stream the video to users. They want to know if this choice will impact the existing multicast design. What impact will their choice have on the existing multicast design?

Options

  • ABecause 239.0.0.1 is a private multicast range, a flood of PIM packets that have to be processed
  • BBecause 239.0.0.1 is a private multicast range, the rendezvous point has to send out constant group
  • CThe multicast application sends too many packets into the network and the network infrastructure
  • DThe 239.0.0.1 group address maps to a system MAC address, and all multicast traffic will have to

How the community answered

(37 responses)
  • A
    11% (4)
  • B
    24% (9)
  • C
    5% (2)
  • D
    59% (22)

Why each option

The multicast address 239.0.0.1 maps to the same Layer 2 MAC address as the well-known 224.0.0.1 All Hosts group, causing all hosts to receive and process the multicast traffic regardless of subscription.

ABecause 239.0.0.1 is a private multicast range, a flood of PIM packets that have to be processed

The 239.0.0.0/8 range being administratively scoped does not trigger additional PIM message flooding - PIM join and prune behavior is governed by group membership and RP configuration, not address scope.

BBecause 239.0.0.1 is a private multicast range, the rendezvous point has to send out constant group

The rendezvous point does not send constant group membership messages based on address scope; RP behavior is controlled by PIM sparse mode configuration and group-to-RP mappings, which are unaffected by the private range selection.

CThe multicast application sends too many packets into the network and the network infrastructure

The volume of packets injected into the network is determined by the application's encoding rate and transmission rate, not by the specific multicast group address chosen.

DThe 239.0.0.1 group address maps to a system MAC address, and all multicast traffic will have toCorrect

IP multicast MAC addresses are derived by placing the lower 23 bits of the IP multicast address into 01:00:5E:xx:xx:xx, which means 239.0.0.1 maps to 01:00:5E:00:00:01 - the exact same MAC as 224.0.0.1, the well-known All Hosts address. Because this MAC is treated as a system-level address that all network interfaces are programmed to accept, every host on the segment will receive and interrupt-process every packet sent to 239.0.0.1, regardless of whether they have joined the group. This MAC address collision bypasses IGMP snooping filtering and impacts all hosts.

Concept tested: IP multicast to Ethernet MAC address mapping collision

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/ip-multicast/9356-48.html

Topics

#multicast address#MAC address collision#Layer 2 flooding#239.0.0.1

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice