300-510 · Question #245
Refer to the exhibit. The four routers in this network have formed adjacencies. Router R2 is an IS- IS level 1-2 router that connects to other areas, and the attach bit is set in the R2 level 1 LSP ad
The correct answer is B. Use the is-type level-1-2 backdoor command to unset the attach bit on R2 and configure a. Option B is correct because the attach bit, when set on a Level 1-2 router like R2, causes Level 1 routers (R1) to install a default route pointing toward R2 - not specific Level 2 prefixes. To achieve the desired behavior of pushing specific routes, you must unset the attach bit
Question
Refer to the exhibit. The four routers in this network have formed adjacencies. Router R2 is an IS- IS level 1-2 router that connects to other areas, and the attach bit is set in the R2 level 1 LSP advertisements to R1. According to the network design, R2 should push level 2 routes from its routing table to the R1 routing table. However, R1 installed a default route in its routing table. Which action resolves this problem?
Exhibit
Options
- AUse the is-type level-1-2 backdoor command to unset the attach bit on R1 and use a prefix list to
- BUse the is-type level-1-2 backdoor command to unset the attach bit on R2 and configure a
- CSet the attach bit on R1 and use a prefix list to filter prefixes from R2.
- DConfigure R2 as a level 1 router and use a prefix list to filter prefixes to R1
How the community answered
(70 responses)- A9% (6)
- B84% (59)
- C3% (2)
- D4% (3)
Explanation
Option B is correct because the attach bit, when set on a Level 1-2 router like R2, causes Level 1 routers (R1) to install a default route pointing toward R2 - not specific Level 2 prefixes. To achieve the desired behavior of pushing specific routes, you must unset the attach bit on R2 (the router generating the LSP) to stop advertising the default, then use a prefix list to selectively leak Level 2 routes into the Level 1 domain so R1 receives and installs those specific prefixes.
Why the distractors fail:
- A is wrong because it targets R1, but R1 is a Level 1-only router - the attach bit originates in R2's LSP, so R1 cannot unset what R2 is advertising.
- C is wrong because R1, as a Level 1 router, has no mechanism to set the attach bit (only L1/L2 routers do), and the underlying default-route problem would remain.
- D is wrong because downgrading R2 to Level 1 severs its Level 2 connectivity entirely, destroying the inter-area design - R2 must remain L1/L2.
Memory tip: The attach bit is R2's way of saying "use me as your exit - here's a default route." To stop that and deliver specific routes instead, you must silence R2's broadcast (unset attach bit at source) and hand-deliver the mail manually (route leaking via prefix list). Always act at the source of the LSP, not the receiver.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
