220-1101 · Question #249
A user is unable to plug a USB 3.0 device into a USB port. Upon inspection, a technician notices the USB 3.0 port appears to be slightly smaller than the other connections. Which of the following is t
The correct answer is D. The USB port belongs to a different form factor.. Standard USB Type-A ports (USB 2.0 and USB 3.0) are the same physical size. If a port appears noticeably smaller than other USB connections on the device, it is almost certainly a different form factor - most likely USB Type-C, which is physically smaller and more oval-shaped. US
Question
A user is unable to plug a USB 3.0 device into a USB port. Upon inspection, a technician notices the USB 3.0 port appears to be slightly smaller than the other connections. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause?
Options
- AA foreign object is stuck inside the port.
- BThe cable connection utilized the wrong orientation.
- CThe USB cable is physically damaged.
- DThe USB port belongs to a different form factor.
How the community answered
(54 responses)- A2% (1)
- B2% (1)
- C4% (2)
- D93% (50)
Explanation
Standard USB Type-A ports (USB 2.0 and USB 3.0) are the same physical size. If a port appears noticeably smaller than other USB connections on the device, it is almost certainly a different form factor - most likely USB Type-C, which is physically smaller and more oval-shaped. USB Type-C is common on modern laptops and tablets alongside full-size Type-A ports. A foreign object (A) would make the port appear blocked or irregular, not uniformly smaller. Cable orientation (B) is a user error, not a port size issue. Physical cable damage (C) affects the cable, not the port's size. The size discrepancy is the definitive indicator of a different form factor.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.