SC-401 · Question #218
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 tenant that contains a user named User1. User1 is assigned the Compliance Administrator role. User1 cannot view the regular expression in the IP Address sensitive info…
The correct answer is C. Create a copy of the sensitive info type and instruct User1 to edit the copy. To allow a Compliance Administrator to view the IP Address sensitive info type's regular expression, create a copy of the built-in "IP Address" sensitive info type in the Microsoft Purview compliance portal and grant the Compliance Administrator role access to that copied…
Question
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 tenant that contains a user named User1. User1 is assigned the Compliance Administrator role. User1 cannot view the regular expression in the IP Address sensitive info type. You need to ensure that User1 can view the regular expression. What should you do?
Options
- AAssign User1 the Global Reader role.
- BAssign User1 to the Reviewer role group.
- CCreate a copy of the sensitive info type and instruct User1 to edit the copy.
- DInstruct User1 to use the Test function on the sensitive info type.
How the community answered
(58 responses)- A2% (1)
- B5% (3)
- C84% (49)
- D9% (5)
Explanation
To allow a Compliance Administrator to view the IP Address sensitive info type's regular expression, create a copy of the built-in "IP Address" sensitive info type in the Microsoft Purview compliance portal and grant the Compliance Administrator role access to that copied custom sensitive info type. You cannot directly edit built-in sensitive info types, but by copying it, you create a custom version that the administrator can then view and modify. Note: Create custom sensitive information types If the preconfigured sensitive information types (SITs) don't meet your needs, you can create and define customized SITs that meet your needs. You can also copy and then edit a built-in SIT. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/sit-create-a-custom-sensitive-information-type
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.