PRINCE2-PRACTITIONER · Question #269
At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant…
The correct answer is C. No, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list. Explanation/Reference:
Question
At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register. Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?
Options
- AYes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
- BYes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
- CNo, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list.
- DNo, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.
How the community answered
(20 responses)- A5% (1)
- C85% (17)
- D10% (2)
Explanation
Explanation/Reference:
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.