nerdexam
PMI

PMP · Question #1302

In the middle of an iteration, the product owner tells the agile team that the government has updated legal requirements. This will result in some changes in the product definition. How should the pro

The correct answer is C. Review the iteration backlog because the product definition has changed and needs to be. When mandatory legal requirements change mid-iteration, the project manager should review the iteration backlog with the product owner because the product definition has fundamentally changed and needs immediate updating.

Submitted by zhang_li· Apr 18, 2026Process

Question

In the middle of an iteration, the product owner tells the agile team that the government has updated legal requirements. This will result in some changes in the product definition. How should the project manager handle this situation?

Options

  • AContinue work and ask the product owner to assess the changes and add/remove the stories as
  • BAsk the product owner to add new changes to the bottom of the backlog in order to handle the
  • CReview the iteration backlog because the product definition has changed and needs to be
  • DAsk a business analyst to assess the changes and then add/remove the stories in the backlog

How the community answered

(28 responses)
  • A
    4% (1)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    79% (22)
  • D
    14% (4)

Why each option

When mandatory legal requirements change mid-iteration, the project manager should review the iteration backlog with the product owner because the product definition has fundamentally changed and needs immediate updating.

AContinue work and ask the product owner to assess the changes and add/remove the stories as

Continuing work without assessing mandatory legal changes could lead to developing non-compliant features and wasted effort, as the basis of the product has shifted.

BAsk the product owner to add new changes to the bottom of the backlog in order to handle the

Adding critical legal changes to the bottom of the backlog defers mandatory compliance, which could result in legal issues and make the current product non-viable.

CReview the iteration backlog because the product definition has changed and needs to beCorrect

Legal requirements directly impact the product definition and are typically non-negotiable. Therefore, the current iteration's scope, as represented by the iteration backlog, must be immediately re-evaluated and adjusted to incorporate these mandatory changes, potentially necessitating replanning or re-prioritization of ongoing work to ensure compliance.

DAsk a business analyst to assess the changes and then add/remove the stories in the backlog

While a business analyst can assist, the primary responsibility for the product backlog and responding to significant changes rests with the product owner, who, with the team, must ensure the iteration backlog reflects the new product definition.

Concept tested: Agile backlog management for mandatory changes

Source: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#sprint-backlog

Topics

#Agile Change Management#Iteration Management#Product Owner Responsibilities#Regulatory Compliance

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Sign up to join the discussion
Full PMP Practice