A team identifies the number of threats and lists them in the order in which they were identified. After analyzing a cause-and-effect diagram, the ownership of the threats and their treatment is…

Question

Options

• ACreate a risk register detailing the threats, their causes, and their treatment strategies; and
• BFocus on the threats during the daily stand up and ensure they are visible to the entire team and
• CPrioritize the risks based on their criticality and timing, and track actions to closure
• DEnsure that the prioritization of threats is complete, and that ownership actions are assigned and

• A
  7% (2)
• B
  21% (6)
• C
  10% (3)
• D
  62% (18)

Explanation

The scenario describes a team that has identified risks, analyzed their causes, assigned ownership, and visualized them on a Kanban board. The critical next step is to ensure threats are actually prioritized by impact and likelihood - not merely listed in order of identification - and that assigned ownership and treatment actions are being tracked to closure. Simply holding threats visible in a daily stand-up (B) is insufficient without structured tracking. Creating a traditional register (A) may add overhead without the prioritization step. Prioritizing by criticality alone (C) is close but omits ensuring ownership and action tracking are complete and followed through.

No community discussion yet for this question.