nerdexam
Salesforce

PLAT-ADMN-201 · Question #1

Universal Containers (UC) has a private sharing model for Opportunities and uses Opportunity teams. Criteria-based sharing rules are not used. A sales rep at UC leaves the company, and their user…

The correct answer is C. The records were manually shared with the user. In Salesforce, there are different types of sharing: Managed Sharing (Role Hierarchy, Sharing Rules) and Manual Sharing. A critical behavior of the platform is that when a user is deactivated, all their Manual Shares (records shared with them by other users using the "Share"…

Submitted by rania.sa· Apr 18, 2026Configuration and Setup

Question

Universal Containers (UC) has a private sharing model for Opportunities and uses Opportunity teams. Criteria-based sharing rules are not used. A sales rep at UC leaves the company, and their user record is deactivated. The rep is later rehired in the same role. A Platform Administrator activates the old user record. The user is added to the same default Opportunity teams but is no longer able to see the same records the user worked on before leaving the company. What is the likely cause?

Options

  • AThe stage of the opportunity records was changed to Closed Lost.
  • BThe record type of the opportunity records was changed.
  • CThe records were manually shared with the user.
  • DPermission sets were removed when the user was deactivated.

How the community answered

(33 responses)
  • A
    9% (3)
  • B
    12% (4)
  • C
    76% (25)
  • D
    3% (1)

Explanation

In Salesforce, there are different types of sharing: Managed Sharing (Role Hierarchy, Sharing Rules) and Manual Sharing. A critical behavior of the platform is that when a user is deactivated, all their Manual Shares (records shared with them by other users using the "Share" button) are automatically and permanently deleted from the system. Even if the user record is reactivated later, those manual shares do not return. Because the organization uses a "Private" model and does not use criteria-based sharing rules, the user's previous access likely relied on manual sharing or their previous position in the hierarchy. While activating the record and adding them back to teams provides new access, the historical "one-off" shares are gone. Options A and B are unlikely to be the cause of a total loss of visibility. Option D is incorrect because permission sets control what a user can do, not which specific records they can see in a private sharing model.

Topics

#Sharing Settings#Record Access#User Deactivation#Manual Sharing

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PLAT-ADMN-201 Practice