PFMP · Question #701
The Monitor Portfolio Value process, while ongoing, has proved to be successful as you work to implement portfolio management. Within six months, you were able to show the usefulness of a simple…
The correct answer is D. A link between using scoring models and benefits analysis. This scenario describes the evolution from a simple scoring model to a weighted scoring model, which directly demonstrates the link between scoring models and benefits analysis. In portfolio management, scoring models are quantitative tools used to evaluate and rank components…
Question
The Monitor Portfolio Value process, while ongoing, has proved to be successful as you work to implement portfolio management. Within six months, you were able to show the usefulness of a simple scoring model to the Oversight Group, and they requested a more sophisticated approach in which weights could be assigned to criteri
Options
- AThis shows:
- BAn acceptance of portfolio management in the organization
- CThe usefulness of the portfolio roadmap
- DA link between using scoring models and benefits analysis
- EThe importance of documenting lessons learned
How the community answered
(33 responses)- A9% (3)
- B6% (2)
- C3% (1)
- D82% (27)
Explanation
This scenario describes the evolution from a simple scoring model to a weighted scoring model, which directly demonstrates the link between scoring models and benefits analysis. In portfolio management, scoring models are quantitative tools used to evaluate and rank components based on expected benefits. When the Oversight Group asked for weights to be assigned to criteria, they were essentially requesting a more nuanced benefits analysis framework - where different benefits and strategic criteria carry proportionate importance. This progression shows that scoring models and benefits analysis are intrinsically connected: the model operationalizes benefits analysis by quantifying and comparing component value.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.