Due to recent organizational restructuring, a portfolio manager decides to reduce the level of portfolio communications to a specific stakeholder. Which of the following is justification for this…

Question

Options

• AChange in strategic objectives
• BChange in component dependencies
• CChange in level of influence
• DChange in portfolio confidentiality requirements

• A
  16% (6)
• B
  8% (3)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  71% (27)

Explanation

Organizational restructuring can alter access rights, roles, and information security classifications, resulting in updated portfolio confidentiality requirements. If a stakeholder's new role no longer justifies access to certain portfolio information, or if restructuring introduces new data classification policies, the portfolio manager is justified - and in fact obligated - to reduce that stakeholder's communication level accordingly. A change in strategic objectives (A) might affect what is communicated but not necessarily reduce communications to a specific person. A change in component dependencies (B) affects scheduling and integration, not stakeholder communication levels. A change in level of influence (C) could be relevant, but restructuring specifically introduces new confidentiality requirements as the formal, governance-based justification for restricting information flow to a specific stakeholder.

No community discussion yet for this question.