nerdexam
Microsoft

MB-310 · Question #383

Drag and Drop Question A company uses Dynamics 365 Finance. The company plans to use batch transfers to improve business processes. The company has the following requirements based on different…

The correct answer is Scheduled batch; Asynchronous. Dynamics 365 Finance: Subledger to General Ledger Transfer Modes The Two Transfer Modes Explained Scheduled Batch Transfers are grouped and processed at defined intervals (e.g., hourly, nightly). Processing is serialized and controlled - the system works through a queue in an…

Set up and configure financial management

Question

Drag and Drop Question A company uses Dynamics 365 Finance. The company plans to use batch transfers to improve business processes. The company has the following requirements based on different scenarios it has experienced: - Resolve conflicts in the general ledger that are due to frequent transfers. - Implement near real-time transfers from the subledger to the general ledger. You need to configure transfer settings for batch transfers to meet the requirements. Which configurations should you recommend for each scenario? To answer, move the appropriate configurations to the correct scenarios. You may use each configuration once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to move the split bar between panes or scroll to view content. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point. Answer:

Exhibit

MB-310 question #383 exhibit

Answer Area

Drag items

AsynchronousScheduled batch

Correct arrangement

  • Scheduled batch
  • Asynchronous

Explanation

Dynamics 365 Finance: Subledger to General Ledger Transfer Modes

The Two Transfer Modes Explained

Scheduled Batch Transfers are grouped and processed at defined intervals (e.g., hourly, nightly). Processing is serialized and controlled - the system works through a queue in an orderly sequence.

Asynchronous Transfers are queued and processed nearly immediately in the background without blocking the user. The system doesn't wait for a schedule; it processes as fast as resources allow.


Why Each Placement is Correct

Scenario 1: Resolve GL conflicts from frequent transfers → Scheduled Batch

Conflicts arise when multiple processes attempt to write to the same general ledger accounts simultaneously. Scheduled batch resolves this by serializing transfers into controlled, timed windows. Instead of many concurrent writes competing against each other, the system processes a consolidated batch at one time, eliminating the contention that causes conflicts.

Scenario 2: Near real-time transfers → Asynchronous

Asynchronous mode queues subledger entries and processes them almost immediately in the background. There's no waiting for a scheduled window - transactions flow to the GL continuously, satisfying the near real-time requirement.


Common Mistakes

MisconceptionReality
"Asynchronous sounds like it would cause conflicts too"Asynchronous processes one-at-a-time from a queue; it doesn't create simultaneous write collisions the way frequent uncontrolled transfers do
"Scheduled batch is slow, so it can't fix anything"Speed isn't the point - serialization is what resolves conflicts
Confusing Asynchronous with SynchronousSynchronous (not listed here) is fully blocking/immediate; Asynchronous is near-real-time but non-blocking

The key distinction: Scheduled batch = conflict control via serialization; Asynchronous = speed via background queuing.

Topics

#subledger transfer#batch transfer#asynchronous#general ledger

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full MB-310 Practice