MB-310 · Question #138
Case Study 3 - Alpine Ski House Background Alpine Ski House has three partially owned franchises and 10 fully owned resorts throughout the United States and Canada. Alpine Ski House's percentage…
The correct answer is Value; Product quantity. Drag-and-Drop Explanation: Purchase Agreement Commitment Types Background: What Are Commitment Types? In Dynamics 365 Finance, Purchase Agreements use commitment types to define the nature of a contractual obligation with a vendor. The four types are: | Type | Meaning |…
Question
Exhibit
Answer Area
Drag items
Correct arrangement
- Value
- Product quantity
Explanation
Drag-and-Drop Explanation: Purchase Agreement Commitment Types
Background: What Are Commitment Types?
In Dynamics 365 Finance, Purchase Agreements use commitment types to define the nature of a contractual obligation with a vendor. The four types are:
| Type | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Value | Commit to spend a minimum dollar amount - no specific product required |
| Product value | Commit to spend a minimum dollar amount on a specific product |
| Product category value | Commit to spend a minimum dollar amount within a product category |
| Product quantity | Commit to purchase a specific quantity of a specific product |
The Two Contracts in the Case Study
The case study describes two distinct purchasing contracts that require configuration:
Contract 1 → Value
"Each franchise resort has an individual contract with a local supplier to purchase at least $10,000 worth of supplies during the calendar year."
- The obligation is purely monetary - a minimum spend of $10,000
- There is no restriction on product type or category; the resort can buy any supplies from that supplier
- This maps directly to the Value commitment type: a dollar-amount commitment with no product specificity
Contract 2 → Product quantity
"A franchise resort in Utah has agreed to purchase 1,000 units of beef at market price from a local supplier."
- The obligation is defined by a specific product (beef) and a specific quantity (1,000 units)
- The price is at market rate (not a fixed price), but the quantity commitment is firm
- This maps directly to the Product quantity commitment type: a unit-based commitment tied to a specific item
Why Not the Other Two Types?
Product value - Not used here because no contract says "spend $X on product Y." The beef contract is quantity-based, not value-based.
Product category value - This might tempt you for the "meat and vegetable discount" mentioned in the case study, but that discount is a trade agreement/discount, not a purchasing commitment. It describes a threshold for receiving a discount, not a contractual obligation to purchase a set amount. It is configured separately (e.g., via trade agreement journals), not as a purchase agreement commitment type.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the meat/vegetable discount with Product category value: The $8,000 meat/vegetable threshold triggers a discount but is not a purchase commitment the company is obligated to meet - it's a pricing rule.
- Using Product value for the beef contract: The Utah beef deal specifies units, not a dollar spend, so Product quantity is correct even though there is an implicit dollar value involved.
- Using Value for both contracts: The beef contract has a specific product and quantity, which narrows it to Product quantity - Value is too broad.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
