ITIL · Question #274
Staff in an IT department are experts in managing specific technology, but none of them know what services are offered to the business. What imbalance does this represent?
The correct answer is D. Extreme internal focus. IT staff focused solely on internal technology expertise without awareness of business-facing services represents an extreme internal focus imbalance in service management.
Question
Staff in an IT department are experts in managing specific technology, but none of them know what services are offered to the business. What imbalance does this represent?
Options
- AExtreme focus on cost
- BExtreme focus on responsiveness
- CVendor focused
- DExtreme internal focus
How the community answered
(33 responses)- A12% (4)
- B3% (1)
- C6% (2)
- D79% (26)
Why each option
IT staff focused solely on internal technology expertise without awareness of business-facing services represents an extreme internal focus imbalance in service management.
Extreme focus on cost refers to prioritizing cost reduction over service quality or business needs, which is unrelated to staff unawareness of business services.
Extreme focus on responsiveness would mean prioritizing fast reaction to incidents over strategic planning, not a knowledge gap about business services.
Vendor focused means decisions are driven by vendor relationships or products rather than business requirements, which does not describe staff ignorance of offered services.
Extreme internal focus occurs when IT staff are highly skilled in managing technology but lack awareness of the services those technologies support for the business. This imbalance means IT is oriented around its own capabilities rather than the value delivered to the business. ITIL identifies this as a key cultural misalignment that Continual Service Improvement aims to address.
Concept tested: ITIL service orientation vs internal technology focus
Source: https://www.axelos.com/certifications/itil-service-management/itil-4-foundation
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.