CBAP · Question #342
A new project has to implement a cyber security release in China, Italy, Germany, the United States, and Canada. The project is a $5 million initiative and must 'go live' in production in all…
The correct answer is A. An agile and iterative approach. For a large, complex, multi-country project with a fixed simultaneous go-live date, an agile and iterative approach best accommodates the scale, geographic complexity, and need for continuous validation.
Question
A new project has to implement a cyber security release in China, Italy, Germany, the United States, and Canada. The project is a $5 million initiative and must 'go live' in production in all countries on the same day and time to be effective. Which of the approaches mentioned is suitable for this project based on the size and complexity?
Options
- AAn agile and iterative approach
- BA waterfall and dynamic approach
- CA kanban and predictive approach
- DA proven and tailored analysis approach
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A73% (19)
- B8% (2)
- C15% (4)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
For a large, complex, multi-country project with a fixed simultaneous go-live date, an agile and iterative approach best accommodates the scale, geographic complexity, and need for continuous validation.
An agile and iterative approach is well-suited for a $5M multi-country cybersecurity initiative because the size and international scope introduce significant complexity that benefits from incremental delivery and continuous feedback loops. Iterative cycles allow the team to validate configurations and compliance requirements in each of the five countries before the final unified go-live date. This approach surfaces integration and regulatory issues early rather than discovering them only at the point of deployment.
Waterfall is a sequential, plan-driven methodology that is poorly suited for complex multi-jurisdiction projects where requirements and regulatory nuances may evolve, and 'dynamic' is not a recognized pairing with waterfall.
Kanban is a flow-based visual management method designed for continuous operational work, not for managing a discrete project delivery with a fixed, simultaneous go-live date.
'Proven and tailored analysis approach' is not a recognized project delivery methodology and does not represent a coherent framework for managing a project of this size and complexity.
Concept tested: Selecting delivery approach based on project size and complexity
Source: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/agile-practice-guide
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.