AZ-500 · Question #63
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might…
The correct answer is B. No. Option B (No) is correct because the goal requires deploying multiple policy definitions as a group, which is achieved using an Azure Policy Initiative (also called a policy set definition), not a Resource Graph. A Resource Graph is used for querying and exploring Azure…
Question
Options
- AYes
- BNo
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A24% (7)
- B76% (22)
Explanation
Option B (No) is correct because the goal requires deploying multiple policy definitions as a group, which is achieved using an Azure Policy Initiative (also called a policy set definition), not a Resource Graph. A Resource Graph is used for querying and exploring Azure resources across subscriptions - it has no capability to group or deploy policy definitions.
Why Option A (Yes) is wrong: While scoping an assignment to a management group is a valid approach for applying policies across multiple subscriptions, the use of a Resource Graph is the incorrect component here. The correct solution would combine a Policy Initiative (policy set) with an assignment scoped to the management group.
The correct solution would be: Create a Policy Initiative (which groups multiple policy definitions together) and then create an assignment scoped to the management group that covers all three subscriptions.
Memory Tip: Think of it this way - Initiative = Group of policies, Management Group scope = Apply to multiple subscriptions, and Resource Graph = Query tool, not a policy tool. Whenever a question asks about deploying multiple policy definitions as a group, your trigger words should be "Initiative" and "Management Group."
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.