Which factors should be considered when setting up Workfront for new departments? (Select two.)

Question

Options

• ATraining sessions tailored to the department's workflows
• BLimiting customizations to reduce complexity
• CReviewing and optimizing their current processes
• DAvoiding integrations with existing tools

• A
  84% (32)
• B
  5% (2)
• D
  11% (4)

Explanation

When onboarding new departments into Workfront, success depends on meeting people where they are (A) and improving the foundation you're building on (C): tailored training ensures adoption by aligning the tool to how that department actually works, while reviewing and optimizing current processes prevents you from digitizing inefficiencies - you want Workfront to reflect better workflows, not just mirror broken ones.

B is wrong because Workfront's customization capabilities are a core strength; limiting them arbitrarily undermines the platform's value and fails to serve the department's unique needs. D is wrong because integrating with existing tools (email, calendars, ERPs, etc.) is a best practice that reduces friction and increases adoption - avoiding integrations would create silos and extra manual work.

Memory tip: Think "Train + Transform" - you must train people on the tool and transform the process before implementing it. Any answer that restricts the platform (B) or isolates it (D) is a red flag on Workfront questions.

No community discussion yet for this question.