820-427 · Question #26
Your ten month-long project has been underway for six months, but it needs to be accelerated so that all project objectives are met a month earlier than originally planned. What two actions could…
The correct answer is C. Ensure that project and task objectives are clear, measurable, and communicated to all E. Gain sponsor agreement to make decisions within three days of receiving the request for. Accelerating a project requires removing two of the most common causes of delay: unclear direction and slow decision-making. Option C (clear, measurable, communicated objectives) ensures teams don't waste time on rework or misaligned deliverables - ambiguity is a silent…
Question
Your ten month-long project has been underway for six months, but it needs to be accelerated so that all project objectives are met a month earlier than originally planned. What two actions could you perform to help achieve this result? (Choose two.)
Options
- AAssess the timing and resource assignments for riskiest tasks, then put extra resources on
- BPrepare presentations for the senior executives, focusing on the project accomplishments
- CEnsure that project and task objectives are clear, measurable, and communicated to all
- DOrganize a project team meeting to explain that new or changed requirements will be
- EGain sponsor agreement to make decisions within three days of receiving the request for
- FConduct design reviews to identify where off-the shelf software can be used instead of the
How the community answered
(18 responses)- A11% (2)
- B6% (1)
- C72% (13)
- F11% (2)
Explanation
Accelerating a project requires removing two of the most common causes of delay: unclear direction and slow decision-making. Option C (clear, measurable, communicated objectives) ensures teams don't waste time on rework or misaligned deliverables - ambiguity is a silent schedule killer. Option E (sponsor commitment to 3-day decision turnaround) eliminates approval bottlenecks, which are among the most frequent causes of project drag, especially when changes need fast authorization to keep momentum.
Why the distractors fall short:
- A is tempting but misses the point - extra resources should target critical path tasks, not just the riskiest ones; risk and schedule impact aren't the same thing.
- B (executive presentations) is stakeholder communication, not acceleration - it doesn't change how work gets done.
- D (meeting about requirements changes) addresses scope control but doesn't directly speed up delivery.
- F (design reviews for off-the-shelf software) is too late at month 6 of 10 - the cost of re-evaluation and potential redesign likely exceeds any savings.
Memory tip: Think "Clarity + Cadence." C = Clarity (everyone knows what done looks like), E = Cadence (decisions happen fast). Both eliminate invisible wait time that silently inflates schedules.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.