820-427 · Question #1
Drag and Drop Question Answer:
The correct answer is Six Sigma; Prince II; MSP; TOGAF. The question is missing its explicit criterion, but based on the correct arrangement, this is clearly ordering these frameworks from narrowest/most tactical scope to broadest/most strategic scope. This is a classic exam question in IT governance and enterprise architecture…
Question
Drag and Drop Question Answer:
Exhibit
Answer Area
Drag items
Correct arrangement
- Six Sigma
- Prince II
- MSP
- TOGAF
Explanation
The question is missing its explicit criterion, but based on the correct arrangement, this is clearly ordering these frameworks from narrowest/most tactical scope to broadest/most strategic scope. This is a classic exam question in IT governance and enterprise architecture courses.
The Ordering: Scope from Tactical → Strategic
| Position | Framework | Scope Level |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Six Sigma | Process/operational |
| 2 | PRINCE2 | Project |
| 3 | MSP | Programme |
| 4 | TOGAF | Enterprise architecture |
Item-by-Item Explanation
1. Six Sigma (most tactical) Focuses on eliminating defects and reducing variation within individual business processes. It operates at the ground level - measuring, analyzing, and improving specific workflows. It has no concern for projects, programmes, or enterprise architecture.
2. PRINCE2 (project level) A structured methodology for managing individual projects - defined start, middle, and end with specific deliverables. It sits above process improvement but below the coordination of multiple projects. Scope is one project at a time.
3. MSP - Managing Successful Programmes (programme level) Coordinates multiple related projects together to deliver strategic change that no single project could achieve alone. It explicitly sits above PRINCE2 in scope - a programme contains projects. MSP is about benefits realization across a coordinated group of initiatives.
4. TOGAF (most strategic) An enterprise architecture framework covering the entire organization's technology, business, data, and application landscape. It provides the overarching blueprint within which programmes and projects operate. It is the widest lens of all four.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing PRINCE2 and MSP order: People forget MSP contains PRINCE2-managed projects. MSP is always broader.
- Placing TOGAF second or third: TOGAF is enterprise-wide - it always sits at the top of this hierarchy.
- Misclassifying Six Sigma: It's not a project or programme methodology - it's a process quality tool, making it the most granular of the four.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.